Anderson cooper 360 Anderson cooper 360 Publisher note:Watch ac360 special homework into politics this week and get tom foreman take on the dirtiest ads, the filthiest races, and the dirtiest campaign trail moments of this midterm spolitical election cycle. California(Msnbc)To hear big dems tell it, the republicans have assembled a secret army of check writing ninjas sneaking many untraceable dollars into the election, even now creeping along with the political night to wreak havoc. And if you ask independent experts, they'll offer you a third read:Both sides are obeying the law, yet hiding the hypocrisy behind what some the actual single dirtiest trick of this election. First some back ground.The issue of anonymous donors using outside groups to push voters to or away from any given candidate has been heating for years.It works a lot like this:If candidate a decides to run for congress because he's really had it with the direct of big oil companies, those same companies can spend millions to attack his positions and suggest candidate b is a better option, and if they do it the particular right type of perfectly legal group, the actual never needs to risk public knowledge that it was behind the effort.Actually a much noted supreme court ruling trapped on tape said such companies and individuals could also take such actions quite openly, but that's another a a section of the story.There is some terms and conditions, but almost no. Suffice to say president barack obama, who you may note has made a lot of productive enemies among business folks, was an early critic of the top court ruling and he still is.You may recall his public dressing down of the top court members at this state of the union address. "Legal court, he explained,"Reversed a century of law that i believe will open the floodgates for special passions, including foreign businesses, to take without limit in our elections.Claims, he is beating on the much wider topic of"Blueprint money"As he campaigns for dems nationally, and top presidential specialist, jesse axelrod, suggests when such groups gin up for republicans, he has no doubt that they're putting their thumb on the scales while hiding the source of their influence from voters.Said, organization us, rely upon us, he told cnn's candy crowley on state in union,"Things are all cool, things are all kosher, don love it, but we not going to reveal.I'll tell you something,(So if perhaps)People don reveal, there an explanation.Favorite target for the dems rrs their old foes from the bush years, karl rove while ed gillespie, who are now hooked up with a big money group in the bingo called american crossroads/crossroads gps.Chamber of the business sector.Over menacing music and dark snaps, they these are known as"Shills for big businessstealing today's democracy;Passing millions from secret donors to elect republicans to do their bidding in congress.It appears to be they've even taken secret foreign money to influence our elections, The chamber undoubtedly denies that last part. "No money that goes into our election activities is from foreign sources, proclaims tita freeman, the chamber's vice chairman of communications and strategy.As for is an excellent it being"A mistery money"States"We've been very clear on our reasons for wanting to protect the privacy of our donors, what she manner is, that many businesses fear the consequences of taking a public stand on policyfrom say consumers or vindictive lawmakersand yet they feel they have to speak up on issues that may adversely affect their own success. When it comes to folks at crossroads, the advertising director there, jonathan collegio, says the dems are presenting a"Huge double widely used, as an example, he admits that, the dems have their own in house groups with secret donors funneling money to their side, and deep customer show support to from labor unions, which are not always wildly clear about if it is backing an ad.So this company of cashing in on backdoor money?Collegio says dems"Obviously have no trouble with it when they've done it, And that's truly the whole problem.As a cost-Efficient matter, conditions about runaway spending from unknown sources are always loudest from the losing side.When either party is outstanding, or expectant a win, that party argues that the shadowy figure behind the curtain is only a harmless friend.Not until he springs out and chooses sides, do they declare that a fantastic is loose. I know democrats love spouting how they tried to pass a law requiring campaign funding be clear, but what they convent from which forget to mention all the exceptions to those rules that they wrote in to cover their donors back sides.And most of those donors look huge unions. I know allot of the unions out there are legit and the leaders have their visitors welfare as their top priority, but allot of the unions out there are corrupt from 50 years of back rooms deals and secret handshakes with political figures, police and anyone else in power that can help them shovel some of that money they take in to their own personal accounts. My personal belief that is in order to be able to donate any money at all you need to be a voter for the election you wish to fund.I mean, if i want to donate money to the democrat candidate for congress in alabama, i must be a listed voter in alabama.If we were to get to this level then the local politicians would actually start caring what their voting members have to say rather than the corrupt unions or greedy corporations. All you bigshots who earn their living writing pablum opinions don get it.The united decision by this ultra conservative group of top court justices(Injustices i contact them)Has enabled business and america 2% wealthiest individuals to cloud political issues with overwhelming ads of lies framing issues that benefit them exclusively in terms to persuade or fool anyone into believing it benefits the public.Please don give me deals are going to speech argument.When one side can afford and uses a gigantic megaphone to drown out the other side who can can afford to only yell as loud as they possibly can.You are watching the beginning of the end of democracy in the states. I saw this portion on 10/25, comparing afscme funded ads to these shadowy groups who are funding republican subjects ads.One such clear false equivalency.Anyone who would like to know anything about afscme just needs to google the name;Less than for these right wing attack ads.They may have a financial institution name show up at the bottom of the screen for 2 seconds, but if you try to track down who they are really, you joining come up empty handed.That the main point. For anderson cooper to sit by and allow these kinds of sophistry to be displayed, obtaining comment, on his indicate to is disgraceful. Why should the democrats reveal their donors and open themselves up to questions when the republicans refuse to?The democrats tried to create a law that would force all sides to reveal their donors but the republicans fought hard and prevented this from happenning.Therefore andertherebyn, let be clear concerning this.Let be honest and honest.Did the democrats try to create some visibility?Obviously.And why were they cannot? Something see results about pandora bracelets diffrent to consider.Home owners united.Democrat?Nicely republican? April 26, Pandora Flowers Charms 2010 inside the 10:50 are Saw the tv segment regarding this post on your show yesterday comparing the american federation of state, county and city and county employees(Afscme)Funding of political ads to what karl rove american crossroads is doing and proclaiming that afscme is behind its acronym.I think this is both wrong and mistaken and not worthy of your usual standards of journalism.Anyone willing to do even be considered a will understand that afscme is funded by the thousands of government workers that provide services to our citizens every day and has been standing up for the rights of these working class americans since 1932.Just because we don know the specific identity of each of those people doesn make them if you'd like to learn who they are, just look across the counter next time you obtain a marriage license or drivers license.This is far not the same as the contributors to american crossroads that, we can just guess, represent the wealthy and fortunate in american society. This was barbeque poor analyzed segments that i seen recently on this topic.Tom did not do any research into the complaints about the transparency issues and simply presented another false equivalence about both parties doing it.Possibly, you can google and find out anything to know about the organization.This segment failed basic journalism 101 the public was not informed about the blog posts at all. Shame you anderson.There is hypocrasy in this years elections but tonight you were not being honest in your them honest.I worked for the state for more than 25 years and was a member of afscme, i paid my dues and the union backed me when i got hurt practical.We specifically who afscme is, america federation of state, county and city employees.So to say we don know exactly who they may be is an outright lie.On the other hand it has been fact checked that the money pouring into the republican party ads come from exactly the same account that accepts donations from abroad.Manage me this, if you had two employers and both paid you thru direct deposit into the same account, how may you keep the money separate?How can you be sure when you wrote a check to pay for your grocerys or your gas bill which employers money was being spent? The garment had been dems $100m republicans $200m. After that the only remaining unasked question re comments being made by them is, who is the larger the better hypocrite?I leave it your esteemed viewers and our american voters decide on. And the chamber of commerce hides behind useless words(Either side do)Of foreign best tools.A compamy bundled in the us, But owned 70% by a say uk prescription drug company and 30 % us shareholders put/fund a negative ad out via these special pacs(Who dont have to say who gave the Pandora Charms UK:http://www.tiscalli.co.uk/ price)Against health related or a candidate who voted for it.Is this:Foriegn money, Why doesn this story have the chamber disclose their additions.It seems that possibly getting a pass.Cnn of all people know oftentimes not required under the worst decision in us history.It allows unlimited cash many benefits by corporations on politics.Why doesn the chamber disclose what they are called.Cnn happens to be a voice of the republican party by not conducting itself in an unbiased way.I am loosing my faith in cnn as a news outlet and know starting to see it as an arm of the small republican media machine.Why don you showcase other groups like, get going, rearranging for america, consumers for progress, working family units, public policy commence?The threat to democracy is real and cnn should spend an afternoon asking key questions and not simply say the democrats haven shown proof.Has the chamber unveiled the donors?What they hiding and why aren cnn asking them and keeping them honest like anderson cooper says he is doing? You may not think we should take the chamber word when they say no foreign money is being poured in?The head of this group has publicly said that shipping jobs overseas is a good thing and they get money from foreign sources with an intention in this.You don think the perfect danger to our country economy and our democracy?This money all goes into a fund that's not separated formally, so doesn't have of knowing how it is being spent, and the chamber refuses to reveal these donors and countries and be open. Oct 25, 2010 attending 11:47 pm hours Anderson you left out something necessary.The democrats tried to pass a law that would require openness for all.The dems, like the united states citizens, believe that both sides should be transparent.But the republicans held back this from happening.Need to?Because big corporation america is their base.

• Related Links:
• http://zone.aimoo.com/blog/moorebella/blog/549188
• http://moore.do.pe/2014/04/09/princess-wedding-dresses-the-store-carries-about-40-percent-nefrom-newborn-tw/
• http://moorebella.mee.nu/pandora_wood_beads_us_studied_music_from_an_instructive_stance

Posted by: moorebella at 02:17 AM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 2022 words, total size 14 kb.